I was just reading fellow basement-dweller/aspiring-above-ground renter Jamie's blog, and my curiousity was piqued by a reference he made to a property in the Yonge and St Clair area. He said it was owned by one of Toronto's "most notorious slumlord families". So, natch, I just had to use my librarian powers to find out who that was, because I don't want to be renting from them if I can help it.
So I Googled ' "slumlord" toronto' and got my answer in a split-second - well, the answer according to Google, at any rate. It's the Wynn family. They've been in the property biz since the 1960s. You can read about some of their buildings here and here. You can visit their website here.
Here is some information potential apartment-seekers might be interested in: the Wynns own the apartment buildings at 103 and 105 West Lodge Avenue in Toronto. These buildings have often been in the news, and it's never been good news. Rats, roaches, repairs not done, no reliable heat or hot water, huge rent hikes and most recently, grow-ops. This last item, to be fair, is not the doing of the landlords, but still, it makes you wonder what kind of business they're running if they can't keep on top of stuff like this?
When a tenant in the Yonge-St Clair building, 125 Lawton Blvd, started a tenant's association in order to advocate for her fellow tenants, the Wynns harassed her with long letters (at least one of which threatened eviction) and labelled her "pathological".
Here's another fact: their commercial holdings include the Waverly Hotel, a notorious dive, albeit one that appears to be cleaning up its act - I think there was a Toronto Star article about this a couple of months ago.
Anyway, I don't know about you all, but I will not be looking into a Wynn rental property any time soon.
Wednesday, 15 August 2012
Tuesday, 14 August 2012
It's about nothing
It's "Au contraire". Not "Oh, contraire!"
It's "correct me if I'm wrong". Not "current me if I'm wrong."
It's "for all intents and purposes". Not "for all intensive purposes".
February 04, 2006 at 10:45 AM in Complaints Department | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
It's about nothing
I'm 30. Thirty. Thir-dee. Three-oh. Trente.
When I was 20, I rather looked forward to turning 30, because I looked young for my age and nobody took me seriously and my "superiors" condescended to me all the time. One of my professors actually literally patted me on the head when I ran into him at the library, while I was on a leave of absence (I was going through a Bad Time). Can you believe it? He was my Creative Writing instructor, and this is what he said to me as he patted me on the head:
"Conrad didn't publish anything until he was in his thirties."
Well, I'm 30 now, and I still haven't published anything worth mentioning. And I still look young for my age. Actually, according to one Smug Married woman I met a couple of months ago, I "look really good for 30". Which I think - but I'm not entirely sure - was a back-handed compliment. A polite, gentle, genteel, well-bred way of saying, "You're definitely in Old Maid Country now, but you just might be able to fool some unsuspecting male into marrying you and impregnating you before you end up with the expired yogurts and the day-old pastries. Have you tried Botox?"
So anyway.
And people still condescend to me, maybe because I look young, but also, I'm a woman and I work in a "customer service" role and I smile a lot and I don't wear suits, so obviously I have very little power or authority or brains.
So. Not much has changed. Well, I have a lot more money than I did when I was 20 - no complaints there. And I have two degrees, and back then I didn't have any. And I have my own apartment, so while it's technically smaller than my shared apartment when I was 20, it's actually bigger because it's all mine. I'm certainly more content than I was then. And I can do things that I couldn't do when I was 20, like run two miles a day and swim thirty laps without stopping. I was skinnier then but I was in terrible physical shape.
Roll on 40!
It's "correct me if I'm wrong". Not "current me if I'm wrong."
It's "for all intents and purposes". Not "for all intensive purposes".
February 04, 2006 at 10:45 AM in Complaints Department | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
It's about nothing
I'm 30. Thirty. Thir-dee. Three-oh. Trente.
When I was 20, I rather looked forward to turning 30, because I looked young for my age and nobody took me seriously and my "superiors" condescended to me all the time. One of my professors actually literally patted me on the head when I ran into him at the library, while I was on a leave of absence (I was going through a Bad Time). Can you believe it? He was my Creative Writing instructor, and this is what he said to me as he patted me on the head:
"Conrad didn't publish anything until he was in his thirties."
Well, I'm 30 now, and I still haven't published anything worth mentioning. And I still look young for my age. Actually, according to one Smug Married woman I met a couple of months ago, I "look really good for 30". Which I think - but I'm not entirely sure - was a back-handed compliment. A polite, gentle, genteel, well-bred way of saying, "You're definitely in Old Maid Country now, but you just might be able to fool some unsuspecting male into marrying you and impregnating you before you end up with the expired yogurts and the day-old pastries. Have you tried Botox?"
So anyway.
And people still condescend to me, maybe because I look young, but also, I'm a woman and I work in a "customer service" role and I smile a lot and I don't wear suits, so obviously I have very little power or authority or brains.
So. Not much has changed. Well, I have a lot more money than I did when I was 20 - no complaints there. And I have two degrees, and back then I didn't have any. And I have my own apartment, so while it's technically smaller than my shared apartment when I was 20, it's actually bigger because it's all mine. I'm certainly more content than I was then. And I can do things that I couldn't do when I was 20, like run two miles a day and swim thirty laps without stopping. I was skinnier then but I was in terrible physical shape.
Roll on 40!
Thursday, 12 July 2012
All work and no play
Makes Jen a dull blogger.
Not much is going on. It's that blah time of year, and I'm taking a course so it's eating up a lot of my time. I haven't even bought the damn G1 book yet. I am spending a lot of quality time with my laptop and also with Jakob Nielsen and his heuristics. Heh. That sounds like the name of band: Jakob Nielsen and The Heuristics. "And now, Jakob Nielsen and the Heuristics will perform 'Navigation Blues'".
Yeah. I need more sleep.
Not much is going on. It's that blah time of year, and I'm taking a course so it's eating up a lot of my time. I haven't even bought the damn G1 book yet. I am spending a lot of quality time with my laptop and also with Jakob Nielsen and his heuristics. Heh. That sounds like the name of band: Jakob Nielsen and The Heuristics. "And now, Jakob Nielsen and the Heuristics will perform 'Navigation Blues'".
Yeah. I need more sleep.
Wednesday, 18 January 2012
So busted!
A few weeks ago, the media was all abuzz over the creation of a "10 most wanted" Web site for criminals in Quebec. They talked about how it was based on a similar FBI Web site in the U.S., and how immediately after the site launched it was used to find and bust one of the perps.
OK, that's kinda cool. But none of the media reports I heard actually told us what the URL for the Web site was. I tried Googling it, but came up with absolutely nothing. Great. A Web site that is a media sensation, except nobody can find it.
Fortunately, Craig Silverman — aka "The Explainer" from Hour — did a piece about it last week, and because Craig is a 21st-century man, he included a link. And here it is: Les 10 criminels les plus recherchés du Québec.
OK, that's kinda cool. But none of the media reports I heard actually told us what the URL for the Web site was. I tried Googling it, but came up with absolutely nothing. Great. A Web site that is a media sensation, except nobody can find it.
Fortunately, Craig Silverman — aka "The Explainer" from Hour — did a piece about it last week, and because Craig is a 21st-century man, he included a link. And here it is: Les 10 criminels les plus recherchés du Québec.
Vrrrrroooooommmm!!!
One evening a few weeks ago, Martine and I took a stroll over to Piazza Navona, in Rome. As we negotiated the narrow passageway into the piazza from corso Vittorio Emanuele II, I noticed things seemed a little more crowed than usual. In the piazza, the periphery on the west side was cordoned off with metal barricades, as if they were expecting a parade, or maybe a demonstration. While a few distracted cops made a half-hearted attempt to keep the path clear, I heard a throaty roar from the north end of the piazza.
Roadster Rally, Piazza Navona, RomeAs the sound grew closer, the cops swept people back behind the barriers. I pushed to the front of the crowd to see what was coming, just as an old roadster from the 1930s roared into view, headlights blazing in the fading light. What a beauty! Behind it was a small red roadster, probably something Italian from the 1950s. Behind that was another roadster, then another.
Apparently there was some kind of roadster rally going on. Not a racing rally, more like a parade rally. The cars would stop, gun their engines, then surge ahead a few dozen feet and stop again. Occasionally someone would let a large gap open in front of them so they could stomp on the gas and close the gap in a thundering roar.
I'm no car expert. In fact, I'm pretty much against most auto racing because I see it as a loud and polluting exercise in irresponsible excess. But there's something about a two-seater roadster that just gets to me.
Roadster Rally, Piazza Navona, RomeIt has nothing to do with speed. I don't need them to go fast. But I love the styling and the connection with the road you feel in a small, open-air, two seater convertible. Especially the old ones with their loud spluttering engines. Those old engines are terribly inefficient, and they blow a lot of smoke, but the sound of those dual exhausts almost makes global warming worth it.
I don't know if I'll ever own a two seater roadster. One of my favorites is the Triumph Spitfire from the 1960s. Terrible cars, really. Unreliable, always breaking down, unsafe at any speed, and pretty gutless with that little 1300 cc engine spitting out about 80 horsepower. But what a feeling when you're tearing down the street and your ass is only about six inches off the ground. All the knobs, dials, and switches are in miniature, and everything is entirely mechanical. No computers, no sophisticated electronics. Just an internal combustion engine banging away, inches from your foot, entirely at the will of that foot and a few mechanical linkages.
I can dream. In the meantime, I was a beautiful sight that evening in Piazza Navona. There were dozens of cars in the rally, mostly antiques. They seemed to be doing a loop through some surrounding streets, because two hours later we passed through the piazza again, and there were still some roadsters doing the circuit. Later still, around midnight, a few of the very dedicated ones were still going around.
rallyNaturally I took pictures. As you can imagine, taking pictures of moving vehicles at night isn't easy. But I got some nice dream-like ones, with motion blurs and other strange effects. My favorite is here (this week's Monday Morning Photo Blog entry) and some others are on Flickr, starting here.
Roadster Rally, Piazza Navona, RomeAs the sound grew closer, the cops swept people back behind the barriers. I pushed to the front of the crowd to see what was coming, just as an old roadster from the 1930s roared into view, headlights blazing in the fading light. What a beauty! Behind it was a small red roadster, probably something Italian from the 1950s. Behind that was another roadster, then another.
Apparently there was some kind of roadster rally going on. Not a racing rally, more like a parade rally. The cars would stop, gun their engines, then surge ahead a few dozen feet and stop again. Occasionally someone would let a large gap open in front of them so they could stomp on the gas and close the gap in a thundering roar.
I'm no car expert. In fact, I'm pretty much against most auto racing because I see it as a loud and polluting exercise in irresponsible excess. But there's something about a two-seater roadster that just gets to me.
Roadster Rally, Piazza Navona, RomeIt has nothing to do with speed. I don't need them to go fast. But I love the styling and the connection with the road you feel in a small, open-air, two seater convertible. Especially the old ones with their loud spluttering engines. Those old engines are terribly inefficient, and they blow a lot of smoke, but the sound of those dual exhausts almost makes global warming worth it.
I don't know if I'll ever own a two seater roadster. One of my favorites is the Triumph Spitfire from the 1960s. Terrible cars, really. Unreliable, always breaking down, unsafe at any speed, and pretty gutless with that little 1300 cc engine spitting out about 80 horsepower. But what a feeling when you're tearing down the street and your ass is only about six inches off the ground. All the knobs, dials, and switches are in miniature, and everything is entirely mechanical. No computers, no sophisticated electronics. Just an internal combustion engine banging away, inches from your foot, entirely at the will of that foot and a few mechanical linkages.
I can dream. In the meantime, I was a beautiful sight that evening in Piazza Navona. There were dozens of cars in the rally, mostly antiques. They seemed to be doing a loop through some surrounding streets, because two hours later we passed through the piazza again, and there were still some roadsters doing the circuit. Later still, around midnight, a few of the very dedicated ones were still going around.
rallyNaturally I took pictures. As you can imagine, taking pictures of moving vehicles at night isn't easy. But I got some nice dream-like ones, with motion blurs and other strange effects. My favorite is here (this week's Monday Morning Photo Blog entry) and some others are on Flickr, starting here.
Truro, Nova Scotia
The plane landed in Halifax after 10:00 at night, which just gave us enough time to grab a rental car and go as far as Truro before we packed it in for the night.
Berry's Motel was cheap -- $69 -- which is not bad for a "housekeeping" motel. That means it had a cheap little two-burner stove, a kitchen sink, two tiny refridgerators, and a crappy two-seater dining table. The grim little bed was in a separate room that seemed awfully claustrophobic when the door was closed.
The building looked nice from the outside, but the finishing inside was bad -- cheap materials, cracks and holes here and there, and no soundproofing.
Berry's Motel was cheap -- $69 -- which is not bad for a "housekeeping" motel. That means it had a cheap little two-burner stove, a kitchen sink, two tiny refridgerators, and a crappy two-seater dining table. The grim little bed was in a separate room that seemed awfully claustrophobic when the door was closed.
The building looked nice from the outside, but the finishing inside was bad -- cheap materials, cracks and holes here and there, and no soundproofing.
Spoiled by Tourism
Meat Cove, Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. Once a frighteningly remote place, this small hamlet at the end of a long road is still off the beaten path. It has recieved more visitors in recent years, however, due to the promotion of Cape Breton and the Cabot Trail as beautiful desitinations and the location of Meat Cove as an "out of the way," and "end of the road" diversion from the usual route. As I discovered last week, the result of this interest in Meat Cove is something that some might call entrepreneurship but I would call a lack of manners.
Cape Bretonners are known for their generous hospitality, so when I arrived in Meat Cove -- which consists of about ten small houses, a camp/picnicground, and a ramshackle canteen -- I was shocked to see this KEEP OUT sign, preventing me from walking to the edge of the cliff to see the spectacular view. In the context of the place and the people, this is downright rude.
Had they roped off some of the camp/picnicground but allowed for a path to the cliff, and then put a box there marked "Donations to help preserve local beauty" I might have dropped in a twenty. But after driving forty minutes out of my way to see this view -- the last few miles on a bumpy dirt road -- I was very offended by this signage (it prevents all access to the cliff unless you pay for the use of a picnic table) and instead I turned around and left, vowing not to return.
Cape Bretonners are known for their generous hospitality, so when I arrived in Meat Cove -- which consists of about ten small houses, a camp/picnicground, and a ramshackle canteen -- I was shocked to see this KEEP OUT sign, preventing me from walking to the edge of the cliff to see the spectacular view. In the context of the place and the people, this is downright rude.
Had they roped off some of the camp/picnicground but allowed for a path to the cliff, and then put a box there marked "Donations to help preserve local beauty" I might have dropped in a twenty. But after driving forty minutes out of my way to see this view -- the last few miles on a bumpy dirt road -- I was very offended by this signage (it prevents all access to the cliff unless you pay for the use of a picnic table) and instead I turned around and left, vowing not to return.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)